| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.4 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
b0671
Core
Dragon Range
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/24
TDP
55 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
46.53k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
28.48k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
15.08k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
17.07k (x0.57)
TOTAL
113.07k
107.15k (x0.95)

Multithread

7945HX

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
443.98k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
343.34k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
147.61k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
16.36k (x0.33)
TOTAL
1313.94k
951.3k (x0.72)

Performance/W
7945HX
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
7945HX
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4