Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 2.6 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 2.6 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
90672
Core
Dragon Range
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
37.79k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
24.07k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
12.44k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
13.71k (x0.46)
TOTAL
113.07k
88.01k (x0.78)
Multithread
7945HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
212.6k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
197.81k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
84.35k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
17.48k (x0.35)
TOTAL
1313.94k
512.23k (x0.39)
Performance/W
7945HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
7945HX
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4