| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Core i5-1235U


Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 4.4 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
906a4
Core
Dragon Range
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
10/12
TDP
55 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
297.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
36.73k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
22.09k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
11.24k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
11.58k (x0.39)
TOTAL
113.07k
81.64k (x0.72)

Multithread

7945HX

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
130.18k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
110.21k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
50.76k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
6.31k (x0.13)
TOTAL
1313.94k
297.46k (x0.23)

Performance/W
7945HX
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
7945HX
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4