| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Core i3-1215U


Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 7.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
906a4
Core
Dragon Range
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/8
TDP
55 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
10240 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
185.6k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
37.56k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
21.13k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
11.35k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
10.31k (x0.35)
TOTAL
113.07k
80.34k (x0.71)

Multithread

7945HX

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
73.97k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
72.37k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
29.61k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
9.65k (x0.2)
TOTAL
1313.94k
185.6k (x0.14)

Performance/W
7945HX
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
7945HX
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4