Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Core i9-11900K
Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i9-11900K gets 748 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.8 times faster than the i9-11900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i9-11900K gets 748 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.8 times faster than the i9-11900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a0671
Core
Dragon Range
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
55 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
101.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
748.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
36.08k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
30.19k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
12.96k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
21.88k (x0.73)
TOTAL
113.07k
101.11k (x0.89)
Multithread
7945HX
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
311.76k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
314.01k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
112.23k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
10.02k (x0.2)
TOTAL
1313.94k
748.02k (x0.57)
Performance/W
7945HX
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
2494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
2512 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
898 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
80 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
5984 points/W
Performance/GHz
7945HX
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
6807 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5695 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
2446 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
4129 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
19077 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4