Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Description
Both models 7940HS and 7800X3D are based on Zen 4 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a60f12
Core
Phoenix
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
AM5
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
98304 kB
Date
March 2023
April 2023
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
104.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
704.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
36.77k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
23.4k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
14.8k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
29.28k (x1.11)
TOTAL
107.71k
104.26k (x0.97)
Multithread
7940HS
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
249.4k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
167.65k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
104.85k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
182.98k (x12.45)
TOTAL
678.46k
704.89k (x1.04)
Performance/W
7940HS
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
1397 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
1525 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
5874 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
7354 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
4680 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
2961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
5857 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
20852 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4