Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the 6800H gets 485.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.4 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the 6800H gets 485.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.4 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a40f41
Core
Phoenix
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
79.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
485.06k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
21.57k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
23.39k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
10.63k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
24.29k (x0.92)
TOTAL
107.71k
79.87k (x0.74)
Multithread
7940HS
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
161.42k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
217.92k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
91.69k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
14.03k (x0.96)
TOTAL
678.46k
485.06k (x0.71)
Performance/W
7940HS
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
3587 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
4843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
2037 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
312 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
10779 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
4589 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
4976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
2261 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
5168 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
16994 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4