Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the 3700X gets 482.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.4 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the 3700X gets 482.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.4 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
870f10
Core
Phoenix
Matisse
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
74.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
482.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
16.77k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
26.3k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
8.81k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
22.53k (x0.86)
TOTAL
107.71k
74.41k (x0.69)
Multithread
7940HS
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
165.4k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
208.96k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
92.87k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
14.87k (x1.01)
TOTAL
678.46k
482.11k (x0.71)
Performance/W
7940HS
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
2545 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
3215 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
229 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
7417 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
5978 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
2002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
5120 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
16911 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4