Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
800f82
Core
Phoenix
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2023
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
15.34k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
25.75k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
5.79k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
17.95k (x0.68)
TOTAL
107.71k
64.83k (x0.6)
Multithread
7940HS
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
123.07k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
239.3k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
60.6k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
8.18k (x0.56)
TOTAL
678.46k
431.14k (x0.64)
Performance/W
7940HS
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4