| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i9-13900HX


Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.3 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b0671
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
877.5k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
49.8k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
26.07k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
13.65k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
15.38k (x0.59)
TOTAL
107.71k
104.9k (x0.97)

Multithread

7940HS

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
375.69k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
329.21k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
157.71k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
14.89k (x1.01)
TOTAL
678.46k
877.5k (x1.29)

Performance/W
7940HS
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
15955 points/W

Performance/GHz
7940HS
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4