| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i5-13400


Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b06f2
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
47.01k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
26.73k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
14.28k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
12.1k (x0.46)
TOTAL
107.71k
100.11k (x0.93)

Multithread

7940HS

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
228.2k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
160.28k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
71.12k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
38.23k (x2.6)
TOTAL
678.46k
497.83k (x0.73)

Performance/W
7940HS
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
7940HS
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4