Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i7-12700
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
90672
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/20
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
March 2023
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
104.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
698.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
48.39k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
26.92k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
13.37k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
15.34k (x0.58)
TOTAL
107.71k
104.01k (x0.97)
Multithread
7940HS
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
415.67k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
158.57k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
109.37k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
14.72k (x1)
TOTAL
678.46k
698.34k (x1.03)
Performance/W
7940HS
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
6395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
2440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
1683 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
226 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
10744 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
9876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
5493 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
2728 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
3131 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
21227 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4