Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i7-1260P
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.7 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.7 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906a3
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-P
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2023
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
391.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
41.94k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
26.81k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
12.63k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
13.51k (x0.51)
TOTAL
107.71k
94.9k (x0.88)
Multithread
7940HS
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
168.12k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
148.09k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
60.28k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
14.58k (x0.99)
TOTAL
678.46k
391.07k (x0.58)
Performance/W
7940HS
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
13967 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4