Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i5-1235U
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 2.3 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 2.3 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906a4
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2023
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
297.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
36.73k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
22.09k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
11.24k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
11.58k (x0.44)
TOTAL
107.71k
81.64k (x0.76)
Multithread
7940HS
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
130.18k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
110.21k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
50.76k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
6.31k (x0.43)
TOTAL
678.46k
297.46k (x0.44)
Performance/W
7940HS
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
19831 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4