Ryzen 9 5980HX vs N97
Description
The 5980HX is based on Zen 3 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5980HX gets a score of 435.9 k points while the gets 86.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5980HX is 5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5980HX gets a score of 435.9 k points while the gets 86.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5980HX is 5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b06e0
Core
Cezanne
Gracemont
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FP6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
12 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
79.43k points
26.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
435.86k points
86.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
22.05k
9.94k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
24.14k
7.74k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.86k
3.83k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.38k
4.76k (x0.21)
TOTAL
79.43k
26.27k (x0.33)
Multithread
5980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
138.44k
36.67k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
199.51k
28.03k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
91.22k
15.47k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.68k
6.53k (x0.98)
TOTAL
435.86k
86.72k (x0.2)
Performance/W
5980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3077 points/W
3056 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4433 points/W
2336 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2027 points/W
1289 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
545 points/W
TOTAL
9686 points/W
7226 points/W
Performance/GHz
5980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4593 points/GHz
2761 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5030 points/GHz
2150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2262 points/GHz
1064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4663 points/GHz
1322 points/GHz
TOTAL
16548 points/GHz
7297 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4