| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5950X vs 7940HS


Description
The 5950X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1060.6 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.5 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a70f41
Core
Vermeer
Phoenix
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
79.51k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
1060.62k points
718.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
19.88k
38.25k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
29.92k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.77k
15.5k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.59k
29.89k (x1.27)
TOTAL
79.51k
113.57k (x1.43)

Multithread

5950X

7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
349.53k
309.6k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
470.67k
260.4k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
207.28k
128.56k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.13k
20.04k (x0.6)
TOTAL
1060.62k
718.59k (x0.68)

Performance/W
5950X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3329 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4483 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
316 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
10101 points/W
20531 points/W

Performance/GHz
5950X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4058 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5155 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2198 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4815 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
16226 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4