| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Ryzen 7 6800H


Description
The 5950X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1060.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 2.2 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a40f41
Core
Vermeer
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
79.51k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
1060.62k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.88k
21.04k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
22.41k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.77k
10.21k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.59k
24.27k (x1.03)
TOTAL
79.51k
77.93k (x0.98)

Multithread

5950X

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
349.53k
158.65k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
470.67k
215.86k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
207.28k
89.45k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.13k
14.77k (x0.45)
TOTAL
1060.62k
478.73k (x0.45)

Performance/W
5950X
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3329 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4483 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
316 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
10101 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
5950X
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4058 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5155 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2198 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4815 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
16226 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4