| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D


Description
Both models 5950X and 5800X3D are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1081 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.7 times faster than the 5800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
a20f12
Core
Vermeer
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
105 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
98304 kB
Date
November 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
87.3k points
83.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
1080.96k points
631.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
22.91k
22.59k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.24k
24.32k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.87k
11.32k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
24.86k (x0.95)
TOTAL
87.3k
83.1k (x0.95)

Multithread

5950X

5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
359.17k
181.41k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
479.04k
236.12k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214.59k
105.13k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.16k
108.48k (x3.85)
TOTAL
1080.96k
631.14k (x0.58)

Performance/W
5950X
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/W
1728 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4562 points/W
2249 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2044 points/W
1001 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
268 points/W
1033 points/W
TOTAL
10295 points/W
6011 points/W

Performance/GHz
5950X
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5363 points/GHz
5525 points/GHz
TOTAL
17817 points/GHz
18467 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4