| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The 5950X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1081 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
b0671
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/24
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
87.3k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
1080.96k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.91k
46.53k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
26.24k
28.48k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.87k
15.08k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
17.07k (x0.65)
TOTAL
87.3k
107.15k (x1.23)

Multithread

5950X

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
359.17k
443.98k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
479.04k
343.34k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214.59k
147.61k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.16k
16.36k (x0.58)
TOTAL
1080.96k
951.3k (x0.88)

Performance/W
5950X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4562 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2044 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
268 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
10295 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
5950X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5363 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
17817 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4