Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i9-11900H
Description
The 5950X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1081 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.8 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1081 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.8 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
806d1
Core
Vermeer
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
87.3k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
1080.96k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.91k
33.38k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
26.24k
27.12k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.87k
11.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
17k (x0.65)
TOTAL
87.3k
89.19k (x1.02)
Multithread
5950X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
359.17k
249.83k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
479.04k
237.26k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214.59k
84.18k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.16k
13.2k (x0.47)
TOTAL
1080.96k
584.47k (x0.54)
Performance/W
5950X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4562 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2044 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
268 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
10295 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
5950X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5363 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
17817 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4