Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i3-6100
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 814.7 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 7.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 814.7 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 7.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
506e3
Core
Vermeer
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/2
TDP
105 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
83.5k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
814.74k points
112.28k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.6k
22.89k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
21.04k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.25k
4.9k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.8k
4.01k (x0.16)
TOTAL
83.5k
52.84k (x0.63)
Multithread
5900X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
258.21k
50.05k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
342.24k
47.13k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
155.3k
11.38k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
59k
3.72k (x0.06)
TOTAL
814.74k
112.28k (x0.14)
Performance/W
5900X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3259 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1479 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
562 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
7759 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
4709 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5177 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2343 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5167 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
17396 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4