Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i9-11900H
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 814.7 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.4 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 814.7 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.4 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806d1
Core
Vermeer
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.5k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
814.74k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.6k
33.38k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
27.12k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.25k
11.69k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.8k
17k (x0.69)
TOTAL
83.5k
89.19k (x1.07)
Multithread
5900X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
258.21k
249.83k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
342.24k
237.26k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
155.3k
84.18k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
59k
13.2k (x0.22)
TOTAL
814.74k
584.47k (x0.72)
Performance/W
5900X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3259 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1479 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
562 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
7759 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
4709 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5177 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2343 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5167 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
17396 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4