Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 3.7 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 3.7 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
a0653
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
227.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
24.31k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
22.15k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
5.14k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
8.46k (x0.32)
TOTAL
89.82k
60.06k (x0.67)
Multithread
5900X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
101.48k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
98.04k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
24.28k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
3.86k (x0.06)
TOTAL
840.11k
227.67k (x0.27)
Performance/W
5900X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4