Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon E5-2698 v3
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the E5-2698 v3 gets 1023.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the E5-2698 v3 gets 1023.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
306f2
Core
Vermeer
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
12/24
16/32
TDP
105 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
16x256 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
40960 kB
Date
November 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
39.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
1023.68k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
20.85k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
10.77k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
4.66k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
3.02k (x0.11)
TOTAL
89.82k
39.29k (x0.44)
Multithread
5900X
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
533.68k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
328.47k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
137.01k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
24.52k (x0.38)
TOTAL
840.11k
1023.68k (x1.22)
Performance/W
5900X
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
3953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
2433 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
1015 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
182 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
7583 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
5791 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
2991 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
1294 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
838 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
10914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4