| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900X vs 6900HX


Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 6900HX is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.8 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
a40f41
Core
Vermeer
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
87.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
462.36k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
24.35k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
26.85k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
11.82k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
24.18k (x0.91)
TOTAL
89.82k
87.21k (x0.97)

Multithread

5900X

6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
152.84k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
208.12k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
88.84k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
12.57k (x0.2)
TOTAL
840.11k
462.36k (x0.55)

Performance/W
5900X
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
3396 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
4625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
10275 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900X
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
4969 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
2413 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
4935 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4