Ryzen 9 5900X vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.7 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.7 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
870f10
Core
Vermeer
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
105 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
November 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
17.57k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
27.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
9.35k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
23.9k (x0.9)
TOTAL
89.82k
78.2k (x0.87)
Multithread
5900X
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
176.08k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
219.88k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
100k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
12.93k (x0.2)
TOTAL
840.11k
508.89k (x0.61)
Performance/W
5900X
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4