| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.1 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
b0671
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
16/24
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
46.53k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
28.48k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
15.08k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
17.07k (x0.64)
TOTAL
89.82k
107.15k (x1.19)

Multithread

5900X

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
443.98k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
343.34k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
147.61k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
16.36k (x0.26)
TOTAL
840.11k
951.3k (x1.13)

Performance/W
5900X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900X
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4