Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i5-13400
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.7 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.7 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
b06f2
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
10/16
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
20480 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
497.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
47.01k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
26.73k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
14.28k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
12.1k (x0.46)
TOTAL
89.82k
100.11k (x1.11)
Multithread
5900X
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
228.2k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
160.28k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
71.12k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
38.23k (x0.6)
TOTAL
840.11k
497.83k (x0.59)
Performance/W
5900X
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
7659 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4