Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 6.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 840.1 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 6.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
806c1
Core
Vermeer
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.82k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
840.11k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.34k
24.25k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.8k
21.63k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.12k
9.09k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.55k
7.23k (x0.27)
TOTAL
89.82k
62.19k (x0.69)
Multithread
5900X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
263.12k
56.9k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
353.9k
55.68k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159.07k
19.29k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.01k
6.09k (x0.1)
TOTAL
840.11k
137.96k (x0.16)
Performance/W
5900X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3371 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1515 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
610 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
8001 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5071 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5584 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2526 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5530 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
18712 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4