Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The 5900HX is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50654
Core
Cezanne
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2021
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
85.76k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
421.05k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HX
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
23.29k
18.78k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.89k
16.25k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.75k
3.99k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
6.8k (x0.27)
TOTAL
85.76k
45.82k (x0.53)
Multithread
5900HX
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
138.16k
133.55k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
192.12k
108.43k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.84k
30.02k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.93k
9.48k (x0.95)
TOTAL
421.05k
281.48k (x0.67)
Performance/W
5900HX
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3070 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4269 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1796 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
9357 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HX
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5064 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5398 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
18644 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4