Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Core i9-10900K
Description
The 5900HX is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.6 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.6 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0655
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
85.76k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
421.05k points
685.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HX
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
23.29k
32.67k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
25.89k
28.49k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.75k
6.53k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
12.72k (x0.51)
TOTAL
85.76k
80.41k (x0.94)
Multithread
5900HX
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
138.16k
307.39k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
192.12k
298.47k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.84k
72.94k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.93k
6.85k (x0.69)
TOTAL
421.05k
685.65k (x1.63)
Performance/W
5900HX
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3070 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4269 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1796 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
9357 points/W
5485 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HX
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5064 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5398 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
18644 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4