Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Core i5-4690
Description
The 5900HX is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 2.6 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 2.6 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306c3
Core
Cezanne
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
85.76k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
421.05k points
163.95k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HX
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
23.29k
22.97k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.89k
13.02k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.75k
5.21k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
4.74k (x0.19)
TOTAL
85.76k
45.95k (x0.54)
Multithread
5900HX
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
138.16k
85.98k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
192.12k
49.01k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.84k
19.5k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.93k
9.46k (x0.95)
TOTAL
421.05k
163.95k (x0.39)
Performance/W
5900HX
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
3070 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4269 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1796 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
9357 points/W
1952 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HX
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
5064 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5398 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
18644 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4