Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Core i5-10500
Description
The 5900HX is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0653
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
85.76k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
421.05k points
387.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HX
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
23.29k
28.73k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
25.89k
26.01k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.75k
6.08k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
14.46k (x0.58)
TOTAL
85.76k
75.27k (x0.88)
Multithread
5900HX
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
138.16k
172.66k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
192.12k
167.57k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.84k
39.45k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.93k
8.31k (x0.84)
TOTAL
421.05k
387.99k (x0.92)
Performance/W
5900HX
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3070 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4269 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1796 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
9357 points/W
5969 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HX
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
5064 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5398 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
18644 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4