| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900HX vs 5900X


Description
Both models 5900HX and 5900X are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900X is 2 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a20f10
Core
Cezanne
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
85.76k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
421.05k points
840.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HX
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.29k
24.34k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
25.89k
26.8k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.75k
12.12k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
26.55k (x1.07)
TOTAL
85.76k
89.82k (x1.05)

Multithread

5900HX

5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
138.16k
263.12k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
192.12k
353.9k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.84k
159.07k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.93k
64.01k (x6.45)
TOTAL
421.05k
840.11k (x2)

Performance/W
5900HX
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3070 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4269 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1796 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
9357 points/W
8001 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900HX
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5064 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5398 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
18644 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4