| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D


Description
Both models 5900HX and 5800X3D are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.5 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a20f12
Core
Cezanne
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
98304 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
85.76k points
83.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
421.05k points
631.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HX
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
23.29k
22.59k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.89k
24.32k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.75k
11.32k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
24.86k (x1)
TOTAL
85.76k
83.1k (x0.97)

Multithread

5900HX

5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
138.16k
181.41k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
192.12k
236.12k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.84k
105.13k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.93k
108.48k (x10.93)
TOTAL
421.05k
631.14k (x1.5)

Performance/W
5900HX
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3070 points/W
1728 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4269 points/W
2249 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1796 points/W
1001 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
1033 points/W
TOTAL
9357 points/W
6011 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900HX
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
5064 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
5405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5398 points/GHz
5525 points/GHz
TOTAL
18644 points/GHz
18467 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4