Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The 5900HX is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f82
Core
Cezanne
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
85.76k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
421.05k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HX
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.29k
15.34k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
25.89k
25.75k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.75k
5.79k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
17.95k (x0.72)
TOTAL
85.76k
64.83k (x0.76)
Multithread
5900HX
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
138.16k
123.07k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
192.12k
239.3k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.84k
60.6k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.93k
8.18k (x0.82)
TOTAL
421.05k
431.14k (x1.02)
Performance/W
5900HX
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3070 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4269 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1796 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
9357 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HX
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5064 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5398 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
18644 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4