Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 5900HX is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HX gets a score of 421.1 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806c1
Core
Cezanne
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
85.76k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
421.05k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HX
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
23.29k
24.25k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25.89k
21.63k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.75k
9.09k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
7.23k (x0.29)
TOTAL
85.76k
62.19k (x0.73)
Multithread
5900HX
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
138.16k
56.9k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
192.12k
55.68k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.84k
19.29k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.93k
6.09k (x0.61)
TOTAL
421.05k
137.96k (x0.33)
Performance/W
5900HX
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3070 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4269 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1796 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
221 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
9357 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HX
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5064 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5398 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
18644 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4