Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i7-5960X
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-5960X is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.5 times faster than the i7-5960X . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.5 times faster than the i7-5960X . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306f2
Core
Cezanne
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
December 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
13.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
294.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
6.6k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
3.8k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
1.41k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
1.34k (x0.06)
TOTAL
81.87k
13.16k (x0.16)
Multithread
5900HS
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
146.65k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
100.72k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
34.09k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
12.83k (x2.21)
TOTAL
434.96k
294.29k (x0.68)
Performance/W
5900HS
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
1047 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
719 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
243 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
2102 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
1887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
1086 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
384 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
3759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4