Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
506e8
Core
Cezanne
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2021
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
58.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
210.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
22.46k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
20.45k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
4.75k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
10.39k (x0.43)
TOTAL
81.87k
58.05k (x0.71)
Multithread
5900HS
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
92.69k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
90.45k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
22.02k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
5.75k (x0.99)
TOTAL
434.96k
210.91k (x0.48)
Performance/W
5900HS
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W