Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.3 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.3 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a70f41
Core
Cezanne
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
December 2021
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
32.74k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
27.35k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
14.23k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
27.41k (x1.13)
TOTAL
81.87k
101.73k (x1.24)
Multithread
5900HS
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
236.69k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
202.63k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
102.8k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
11.28k (x1.95)
TOTAL
434.96k
553.41k (x1.27)
Performance/W
5900HS
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4