Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4750GE is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
860f01
Core
Cezanne
Renoir
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
December 2021
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
60.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
469.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
16.95k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
26.26k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
9.4k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
8.38k (x0.35)
TOTAL
81.87k
60.99k (x0.75)
Multithread
5900HS
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
159.87k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
215.44k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
88.45k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
5.9k (x1.02)
TOTAL
434.96k
469.67k (x1.08)
Performance/W
5900HS
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
13419 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4