| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Ryzen 7 5700G


Description
Both models 5900HS and 5700G are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the 5700G gets 484.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a50f00
Core
Cezanne
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
December 2021
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
84.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
484.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
22.99k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
25.24k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
11.56k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
24.7k (x1.02)
TOTAL
81.87k
84.49k (x1.03)

Multithread

5900HS

5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
159.36k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
215.57k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
98.78k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
10.4k (x1.79)
TOTAL
434.96k
484.11k (x1.11)

Performance/W
5900HS
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
3316 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
1520 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
7448 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900HS
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
4998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5487 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
5369 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
18367 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4