Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 5900HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900HS gets a score of 435 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
90672
Core
Cezanne
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
December 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.87k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
434.96k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.2k
37.79k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
24.07k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
12.44k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.22k
13.71k (x0.57)
TOTAL
81.87k
88.01k (x1.08)
Multithread
5900HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
145.13k
212.6k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
198.36k
197.81k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.67k
84.35k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
17.48k (x3.02)
TOTAL
434.96k
512.23k (x1.18)
Performance/W
5900HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4147 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5667 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2448 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
12427 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4608 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2488 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5266 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
17797 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4