Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i7-6560U
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-6560U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 3.4 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 3.4 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
406e3
Core
Renoir
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
52.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
107.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
22.21k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
19.25k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
4.41k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
7.09k (x0.86)
TOTAL
53k
52.96k (x1)
Multithread
4900HS
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
44.94k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
44.98k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
10.83k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
6.26k (x0.83)
TOTAL
360.57k
107.01k (x0.3)
Performance/W
4900HS
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
2996 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
2998 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
722 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
418 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
7134 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
6941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
6017 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
16550 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4