Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i5-10400F
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0655
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16386 kB
Date
March 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
28.39k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
24.89k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
5.78k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
13.19k (x1.61)
TOTAL
53k
72.25k (x1.36)
Multithread
4900HS
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
180.2k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
163.51k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
40.6k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
6.48k (x0.86)
TOTAL
360.57k
390.78k (x1.08)
Performance/W
4900HS
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4