| | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
Both models 4900HS and 3600 are based on Zen 2 architecture.

Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 353.9 k points while the 3600 gets 370.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
870f10
Core
Renoir
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4094 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2020
July 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
11708
15835 (35.24%)
Test#2 (FP)
18437
24313 (31.87%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6739
8665 (28.58%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8012
21426 (167.44%)
TOTAL
44895
70239 (56.45%)

Multithread

4900HS

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
124445
122648 (-1.44%)
Test#2 (FP)
152155
152187 (0.02%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69750
68898 (-1.22%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7513
27038 (259.90%)
TOTAL
353862
370772 (4.78%)

Performance/W
4900HS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3556 points/W
1887 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4347 points/W
2341 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1993 points/W
1060 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
416 points/W
TOTAL
10110 points/W
5704 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2723 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4288 points/GHz
5789 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1567 points/GHz
2063 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1863 points/GHz
5102 points/GHz
TOTAL
10441 points/GHz
16724 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8