Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.6 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.6 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
140.97k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
10.88k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
18.09k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
4.29k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.36k (x0.41)
TOTAL
53k
36.64k (x0.69)
Multithread
4900HS
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
42.44k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
73.82k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
20.76k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
3.96k (x0.53)
TOTAL
360.57k
140.97k (x0.39)
Performance/W
4900HS
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
9398 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4