Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.8 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.8 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
14.58k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
23.98k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
5.35k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
6.34k (x0.77)
TOTAL
53k
50.25k (x0.95)
Multithread
4900HS
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
57.37k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
107.03k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
28.9k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
7.05k (x0.94)
TOTAL
360.57k
200.34k (x0.56)
Performance/W
4900HS
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4