Ryzen 9 4900HS vs A9 9425
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 8.6 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 8.6 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
670f00
Core
Renoir
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2020
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
11.23k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
14.7k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
3.15k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
2.24k (x0.27)
TOTAL
53k
31.31k (x0.59)
Multithread
4900HS
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
16.58k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
17.84k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
5.09k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
2.23k (x0.3)
TOTAL
360.57k
41.73k (x0.12)
Performance/W
4900HS
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
2782 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4