Ryzen 9 3950X vs Core i9-11900H
Description
The 3950X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3950X gets a score of 959.8 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 1.6 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3950X gets a score of 959.8 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 1.6 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806d1
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
959.77k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3950X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.49k
33.38k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
26.16k
27.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.9k
11.69k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.4k
17k (x0.76)
TOTAL
72.95k
89.19k (x1.22)
Multithread
3950X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
334.49k
249.83k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
423.74k
237.26k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
187.85k
84.18k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
13.2k (x0.96)
TOTAL
959.77k
584.47k (x0.61)
Performance/W
3950X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3186 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4036 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1789 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
130 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
9141 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
3950X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3509 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5566 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1681 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4765 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
15522 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4